Dodd v. Rynearson's Adm'r

8 Ky. Op. 672, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 191
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided April 11, 1876·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Mrs. Sarah Dodd was a married woman when she signed the note, and the contract is not such as under the statute a married woman can bind herself or estate for, consequently, as to her the contract was void; but although it was void as to her it was valid and binding on Isom Dodd, Floyd Burks and George Bradshaw, who labored under no disability. And they were not the sureties of Mrs. Sarah Dodd within the meaning of the statute, because she was not capable of binding herself, and the debt was the debt of the other persons who signed the note, not as sureties but as principals, there being no one bound for whom they could become surety. Gaines’s Adm’x v. Poor, 3 Met. 503; Short v. Bryant, 10 B. Mon. 10.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodd v. Rynearson's Adm'r, 8 Ky. Op. 672, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 191 (Ky. Ct. App. 1876).

8 Ky. Op. 672 (Dodd v. Rynearson's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines' administratrix v. Poor
60 Ky. 503 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1861)
Short v. Bryant
49 Ky. 10 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1849)