Dodd v. Middletown Lodge (Elks Club) No. 1097

277 A.D.2d 276, 715 N.Y.S.2d 343, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11755
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law (see, Executive Law § 296), to recover damages for gender discrimination, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated January 10, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, an at-will employee, claims that she was terminated from her job as a bartender at the defendant Middletown Lodge (Elks Club) No. 1097 (hereinafter the Lodge) as a result of gender discrimination. However, the defendant demonstrated the absence of a prima facie case of discrimination under Executive Law § 296, and the plaintiff failed to establish the existence of any material issue of fact (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623, 631). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the Lodge’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Gilroy v Continental Corp., 237 AD2d 251; Wozniak v Components Assembly Div., 220 AD2d 934; Ioele v Alden Press, 145 AD2d 29). Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodd v. Middletown Lodge (Elks Club) No. 1097, 277 A.D.2d 276, 715 N.Y.S.2d 343, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 276 (Dodd v. Middletown Lodge (Elks Club) No. 1097) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeFrancis v. North Shore Plainview Hospital
52 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)