Dodd v. Lewis

10 Mass. 26
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1813·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

When a party, against whom costs are to be taxed, by himself or his attorney, notifies the clerk that he desires to be present at the taxation of such costs, it is the duty of the clerk to give notice to such party or his attorney previous to his allowance of the bill of costs; and if the parties cannot agree, application is to be made to a judge at his chambers for his decision.

ADDITIONAL NOTE

[See Stafford vs. Stevens, 2 Wend. 158. — Jackson vs. Hautley, 2 Wend. 244.—Houdley vs. Cuyler, 10 Wend. 593.— Stockholm vs. Robbins, 24 Wend. 109. — Shuman vs. Pfoutz, 1 Penns. 61. — Richardson vs. Cassilly, 5 Watts, 449. —M' Williams vs. Hopkins, 1 Whart. 276. — Rutledge vs. Giles, 2 Tyr. 169. — F. H.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodd v. Lewis, 10 Mass. 26 (Mass. 1813).

10 Mass. 26 (Dodd v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoadley v. Cuyler
10 Wend. 593 (New York Supreme Court, 1833)
Safford v. Stevens
2 Wend. 158 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1828)
Richardson v. Cassilly
5 Watts 449 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)
Same v. Same
1 Whart. 276 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)