Dodd v. COPELAND
247 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 537, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion, 99 N.J. Super. 481 (1968).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — Fone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dodd v. COPELAND, 247 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 537, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1968).
247 A.2d 129 (Dodd v. COPELAND) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bashir v. Commissioner
712 A.2d 670 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
Peters v. Marriott Corp.
650 A.2d 1051 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.
509 A.2d 808 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Filtrator Apparatus Co. v. Food Enterprises, Inc.
491 F. Supp. 566 (D. New Jersey, 1980)
Van Houten v. NJ Manufacturers Ins. Co.
387 A.2d 419 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Richard v. Johnson
234 N.W.2d 22 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1975)