Dodd v. Barnes

279 F. Supp. 290, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8053
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee
DecidedJuly 5, 1967
DocketCiv. No. 819
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 F. Supp. 290 (Dodd v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodd v. Barnes, 279 F. Supp. 290, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8053 (E.D. Tenn. 1967).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A three-judge Court having been constituted herein under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 2281; and it now appearing to such Court that the private act of the General Assembly of Tennessee under which the defendants are sought to be enjoined herein is one of limited application, concerning only Warren County, Tennessee and no other county or other local jurisdiction of the state of Tennessee, and that 28 U.S.C. § 2281 authorizes a three-judge court only when a state statute of general and statewide application is sought to be enjoined, Moody v. Flowers (1967), 387 U.S. 97, 87 S.Ct. 1544, 18 L.Ed.2d 643; and, it therefore appearing to such Court that the three-judge Court herein was improperly constituted and should be dissolved forthwith : it hereby is

Ordered that the three-judge Court herein is dissolved, and this action is transferred to the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Winchester Division, for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F. Supp. 290, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodd-v-barnes-tned-1967.