Dodaro v. Dodaro

269 A.D.2d 420, 702 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1355
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 420 (Dodaro v. Dodaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodaro v. Dodaro, 269 A.D.2d 420, 702 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant mother appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated July 2, 1998, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff father custody of the parties’ two infant children.

[421]*421Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s determination that it was in the best interests of the children to award sole custody of both children to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Goodman v Draper, 266 AD2d 651; Kelley-Milone v Milone, 256 AD2d 554; cf., Matter of Hamza v Hamza, 256 AD2d 618).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to appoint a successor law guardian under the particular circumstances of this case (see, Matter of Walker v Tallman, 256 AD2d 1021; Matter of Farnham v Farnham, 252 AD2d 675; Nacson v Nacson, 166 AD2d 510; cf., Matter of Acosta v Acosta, 259 AD2d 747).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norman v. Dykman
23 A.D.3d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Samide v. Samide
274 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 420, 702 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodaro-v-dodaro-nyappdiv-2000.