Documation, Inc. v. Pence

390 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1980
DocketNo. UU-19
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 390 So. 2d 1248 (Documation, Inc. v. Pence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Documation, Inc. v. Pence, 390 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We note that claimant has included a petition for attorney’s fees in his answer brief. Although in this workers’ compensation case, we have found the points raised by appellant to be without merit, we deny the request for attorney’s fees because it was improperly filed. We have previously determined that Rule 9.400(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a motion for attorney’s fees be filed separately. See Florida Dept. of Commerce v. Davies, 379 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Wallace v. Walton Context Building, 383 So.2d 729 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Munroe Memorial Hospital v. Thompson, 388 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

McCORD, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ„ concur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Fisher
390 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/documation-inc-v-pence-fladistctapp-1980.