Documation, Inc. v. Pence

390 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1980·No. No. UU-19·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We note that claimant has included a petition for attorney’s fees in his answer brief. Although in this workers’ compensation case, we have found the points raised by appellant to be without merit, we deny the request for attorney’s fees because it was improperly filed. We have previously determined that Rule 9.400(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a motion for attorney’s fees be filed separately. See Florida Dept. of Commerce v. Davies, 379 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Wallace v. Walton Context Building, 383 So.2d 729 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Munroe Memorial Hospital v. Thompson, 388 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

McCORD, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ„ concur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Documation, Inc. v. Pence, 390 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

390 So. 2d 1248 (Documation, Inc. v. Pence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Fisher
390 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)