Doctor's Office v. Agency for Health Care Administration
912 So. 2d 1274, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17248, 2005 WL 2861569
Opinion
We affirm the Agency for Health Care Administration’s final order accepting the administrative law judge’s recommendations. On appeal, The Doctor’s Office argues that review should be by peer review organization rather than individual peer. This point was not raised below. In the absence of fundamental error, the point is deemed waived on appeal. Perry v. State, 817 So.2d 985, 987 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doctor's Office v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 912 So. 2d 1274, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17248, 2005 WL 2861569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
912 So. 2d 1274 (Doctor's Office v. Agency for Health Care Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perry v. State
817 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)