Doctor's Hospital Augusta v. Horton Homes, Inc.
215 F. App'x 817
Opinion
After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the district court is due to be affirmed because plaintiff has not proved that the decision of the plan administrator was wrong. The evidence before the decision-maker clearly indicated that Candace was not “principally dependent” on her father, the covered employee.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district courtis
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doctor's Hospital Augusta v. Horton Homes, Inc., 215 F. App'x 817 (11th Cir. 2007).
215 F. App'x 817 (Doctor's Hospital Augusta v. Horton Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.