Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Duree, No. Cv00-0436059 (Jun. 15, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Duree, No. Cv00-0436059 (Jun. 15, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 7230

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 15, 2000

DocketNo. CV00-0436059

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 7230 (Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Duree, No. Cv00-0436059 (Jun. 15, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Duree, No. Cv00-0436059 (Jun. 15, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 7230 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE OBJECTION TO REGISTRATION OF FILING JUDGMENT The defendant objects to the registration in Connecticut of the Kansas judgment entered against him in Subway Restaurants, Inc. v. Kessler andBanks, Case No. 90C12370, District Court of Johnson County, Kansas (July 19, 1996). All the issues raised by the defendant have been fully explored in other fora, resulting in well reasoned decisions adverse to him, which reasoning this court adopts. See, Subway Restaurants, Inc. v.Kessler, 266 Kan. 433, 970 P.2d 526 (1998) and the reasoning behind the court's orders of July 1, 1998 (Dierker, Jr., J.), August 14, 1998 (Calvin, C.J.), and December 7, 1999, (Dierker, Jr., J.), all of which are dispositive of the issues raised by the defendant here. Because the court finds the reasoning of those decisions persuasive, it is not necessary to consider whether, independent of their merits, those decisions collaterally estop the defendant to raise his present objections.

The objection to the registration of the filing judgment is therefore overruled.

Jonathan E. Silbert, Judge CT Page 7231

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE OBJECTION TO REGISTRATION OF FILING JUDGMENT The defendant objects to the registration in Connecticut of the Kansas judgment entered against him in Subway Restaurants, Inc. v. Kessler andBanks, Case No. 90C12370, District Court of Johnson County, Kansas (July 19, 1996). All the issues raised by the defendant have been fully explored in other fora, resulting in well reasoned decisions adverse to him, which reasoning this court adopts. See, Subway Restaurants, Inc. v.Kessler, 266 Kan. 433, 970 P.2d 526 (1998) and the reasoning behind the court's orders of July 1, 1998 (Dierker, Jr., J.), August 14, 1998 (Calvin, C.J.), and December 7, 1999, (Dierker, Jr., J.), all of which are dispositive of the issues raised by the defendant here. Because the court finds the reasoning of those decisions persuasive, it is not necessary to consider whether, independent of their merits, those decisions collaterally estop the defendant to raise his present objections.

The objection to the registration of the filing judgment is therefore overruled.

Jonathan E. Silbert, Judge CT Page 7231

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 7230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctors-associates-inc-v-duree-no-cv00-0436059-jun-15-2000-connsuperct-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack