Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Doctor v. State

Doctor v. State

25 So. 3d 701, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2010 WL 184369
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2010
Docket1D09-6599
StatusPublished

This text of 25 So. 3d 701 (Doctor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doctor v. State, 25 So. 3d 701, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2010 WL 184369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is sua sponte treated as one alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. As counsel concedes, her failure to respond to an order of this court resulted in the dismissal of petitioner’s timely direct appeal in case number 1D09-4531. Under these circumstances, reinstatement of that appeal is appropriate. Accordingly, the petition is granted and the appeal in case number 1D09-4531 will be reinstated by separate order in that proceeding.

VAN NORTWICK and CLARK, JJ., and BERGER, WENDY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bronk v. State
25 So. 3d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 So. 3d 701, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2010 WL 184369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctor-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.