Doctor v. State

698 So. 2d 1224, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1365, 1997 WL 561504
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 11, 1997·No. No. 88954·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Doctor v. State, 677 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), based on conflict with Wilson v. State, 668 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We have since quashed Wilson. See State v. Wilson, 686 So.2d 569 (Fla.1996). We approve the result in Doctor on this issue.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doctor v. State, 698 So. 2d 1224, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1365, 1997 WL 561504 (Fla. 1997).

698 So. 2d 1224 (Doctor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Martinez
103 So. 3d 1013 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Gracia v. State
98 So. 3d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Pittman v. State
22 So. 3d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Langdon v. State
947 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Vazquez v. Lago Grande Homeowners Ass'n
900 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Muniz v. Muniz
789 So. 2d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Dollar Enterprises, Inc.
702 So. 2d 1319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)