Doctor v. Kendall

New York Supreme Court

Doctor v. Kendall

2 How. Pr. 239

DecidedSeptember 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 239 (Doctor v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doctor v. Kendall, 2 How. Pr. 239 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice.

It appears that the fourth count was inserted in good faith, and in the belief that it was essential to the plaintiffs’ rights ; and it is not certainly clear but that the count may be necessary for the purpose of avoiding any question about the town in which the locus in quo is situate. The addition of that count can not put the defendants to much trouble or expense. Motions denied,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, Chief Justice.

It appears that the fourth count was inserted in good faith, and in the belief that it was essential to the plaintiffs’ rights ; and it is not certainly clear but that the count may be necessary for the purpose of avoiding any question about the town in which the locus in quo is situate. The addition of that count can not put the defendants to much trouble or expense. Motions denied,.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctor-v-kendall-nysupct-1846.