Doctor Goldshteyn Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Indem. Co.
This text of Doctor Goldshteyn Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Indem. Co. (Doctor Goldshteyn Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Travelers Indemnity Co., Respondent.
Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (Galina Feldsherova, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Michael L. Rappaport, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered January 12, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the record demonstrates that defendant did not receive requested verification and, thus, that the action is premature (see Central Suffolk Hosp. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 24 AD3d 492 [2005]). Indeed, on appeal, plaintiff notes that it had partially responded to defendant's verification requests.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 19, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doctor Goldshteyn Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Indem. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctor-goldshteyn-chiropractic-pc-v-travelers-indem-co-nyappterm-2017.