Dockum, Richard Leslie v. State
This text of Dockum, Richard Leslie v. State (Dockum, Richard Leslie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00225-CR
RICHARD LESLIE DOCKUM, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 956,668
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of the offense of theft by check and sentenced to two years= imprisonment on May 3, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until February 7, 2005.
A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dockum, Richard Leslie v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dockum-richard-leslie-v-state-texapp-2005.