Docktor v. McCrocklin

669 So. 2d 1129, 1996 WL 120978
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1996·No. 94-1915·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

669 So.2d 1129 (1996)

Sally DOCKTOR, Appellant,
v.
John McCROCKLIN, Appellee.

No. 94-1915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1996.

Sally Docktor, Highland Beach, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

FARMER, Judge.

In this appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure, we reverse for failure to serve process within 120 days from the filing of the amended complaint adding appellant as a defendant.

The amended complaint first naming appellant as a defendant was deemed filed on 13 March, but process was not served on her until 3 October. Although a motion was filed and heard arguing that service was outside the 120-day rule, the trial court denied the motion. Even after a motion for reconsideration, the trial court refused to grant the motion. Later when appellant sought relief from the default, she again raised the untimeliness of service, but once again the court denied relief.

There is nothing in this record showing any reason why the mortgagee did not timely serve process, much less anything amounting to good cause. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(i). We therefore have no alternative but to reverse *1130 and dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

REVERSED.

PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Docktor v. McCrocklin, 669 So. 2d 1129, 1996 WL 120978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

669 So. 2d 1129 (Docktor v. McCrocklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amaran v. Marath
34 So. 3d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Totura & Co., Inc. v. Williams
754 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Vidal v. Perez
720 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Eldridge v. Multi-Resources, Inc.
695 So. 2d 1320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)