Dockstader v. Sammons
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 546 (Dockstader v. Sammons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I am of opinion that the statute relating to double costs in suits against public officers (2 R. S. 617, § 24, subd. 1) does not apply to a case of this kind. The provision is, that double costs may be recovered by the defendant, where judgment is rendered in his favor upon verdict, demurrer, writ of error &c. Here the plaintiff in error—not the defendant— asks for double costs. My recollection is that this question was passed upon by the court some time ago.
[547]*547Cowen, J. That is probably the case to which I referred. I think it was submitted to all the judges in consultation, and that we concurred in denying the motion for the reasons already stated.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Hill & Den. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dockstader-v-sammons-nycterr-1842.