Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

934 A.2d 700

DecidedNovember 21, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 934 A.2d 700 (Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 934 A.2d 700 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, because in sustaining the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s preliminary objections, the Commonwealth Court did not address Appellant’s argument that the requirement that he submit a confession to his crimes constitutes unconstitutional compelled speech, the case is REMANDED for the Commonwealth Court to conduct a review of this question. In all other respects, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, because in sustaining the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s preliminary objections, the Commonwealth Court did not address Appellant’s argument that the requirement that he submit a confession to his crimes constitutes unconstitutional compelled speech, the case is REMANDED for the Commonwealth Court to conduct a review of this question. In all other respects, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

934 A.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dockins-v-pennsylvania-board-of-probation-parole-pa-2007.