Dockhorn v. Kincaid

250 So. 2d 646, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6300
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1971·No. No. 71-29·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant sued on an oral contract alleging performance on his part and failure of defendant-appellee to pay an un-liquidated amount of damages. Summary judgment was entered by the court below in favor of defendant-appellee which judgment was predicated upon accord and satisfaction.

The undisputed facts herein place this case squarely within the ambit of Miller-Dunn Co., Inc. v. Green,1 and it is con[647] trolled thereby. The case is clearly distinguishable from that decided by this court in Best Concrete Corp. v. Oswalt Engineering,2 in which the sums paid were on a disputed claim which constituted no part of the claim sued for in that case.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dockhorn v. Kincaid, 250 So. 2d 646, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6300 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

250 So. 2d 646 (Dockhorn v. Kincaid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Best Concrete Corp. v. Oswalt Engineering Serv. Corp.
188 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Miller-Dunn Company, Inc. v. Green
16 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)