Dockery v. Prince George's County Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Dockery v. Prince George's County Commissioner

42 F. App'x 584

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2002·No. No. 02-1259·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jasper Lloyd Dockery appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dockery v. Prince George’s County Comm’r, No. CA-00-3548-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 29, 2002 & entered Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jasper Lloyd Dockery appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dockery v. Prince George’s County Comm’r, No. CA-00-3548-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 29, 2002 & entered Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dockery v. Prince George's County Commissioner, 42 F. App'x 584 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 584 (Dockery v. Prince George's County Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related