Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman

2 F. App'x 78
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 10, 2001·No. No. 00-7601·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Agia Dockery appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gershon, J.) entered on March 31, 2000, dismissing her complaint in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court held that, under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, it did not possess jurisdiction to hear appellant’s claims. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983).

We affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court. See Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman, 90 F.Supp.2d 233 (E.D.N.Y.2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman, 2 F. App'x 78 (2d Cir. 2001).

2 F. App'x 78 (Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman
90 F. Supp. 2d 233 (E.D. New York, 2000)