Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.

31 A. 656, 167 Pa. 370, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 914

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 8, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 69

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 31 A. 656 (Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co., 31 A. 656, 167 Pa. 370, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 914 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:,

The controlling questions in this case have been fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned master that we find it unnecessary to specially notice either of the assignments of error. There is nothing in any of them that [382]*382requires a reversal or modification of the decree. It is affirmed on the clear, concise and convincing report of the master.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:,

The controlling questions in this case have been fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned master that we find it unnecessary to specially notice either of the assignments of error. There is nothing in any of them that [382]*382requires a reversal or modification of the decree. It is affirmed on the clear, concise and convincing report of the master.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 656, 167 Pa. 370, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dock-v-schlichter-jute-cordage-co-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack