Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.

31 A. 656, 167 Pa. 370, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 914

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 8, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 69·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:,

The controlling questions in this case have been fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned master that we find it unnecessary to specially notice either of the assignments of error. There is nothing in any of them that [382] requires a reversal or modification of the decree. It is affirmed on the clear, concise and convincing report of the master.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:,

The controlling questions in this case have been fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned master that we find it unnecessary to specially notice either of the assignments of error. There is nothing in any of them that [382] requires a reversal or modification of the decree. It is affirmed on the clear, concise and convincing report of the master.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co., 31 A. 656, 167 Pa. 370, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 914 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 656 (Dock v. Schlichter Jute Cordage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related