Dock Lee Minter v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dock Lee Minter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 S.W.3d 941
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 2019·No. 06-18-00160-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00160-CR

DOCK LEE MINTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. CR17-128

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER

Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who

was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record

contains the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule

9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the

clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in

accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 7, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dock Lee Minter v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Dock Lee Minter v. State (Dock Lee Minter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.