Dock Lee Minter v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-18-00160-CR
DOCK LEE MINTER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. CR17-128
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as
that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who
was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record
contains the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule
9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,
including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in
accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 7, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dock Lee Minter v. State (Dock Lee Minter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.