Dobson v. State
860 So. 2d 1075, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18719, 2003 WL 22900542
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 2003·No. No. 3D02-2959·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The decision of whether to appoint counsel in a post-conviction proceeding is subject to review under an abuse of discretion standard, see Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363, 1365-66 (Fla.1979), and finding no such abuse in this case, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dobson v. State, 860 So. 2d 1075, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18719, 2003 WL 22900542 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
860 So. 2d 1075 (Dobson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holmes v. State
964 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)