Dobson v. Samson

627 So. 2d 1232, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1993 WL 495414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dobson v. Samson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1993·No. No. 91-1991·Published

Opinions

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM.

We consider the present case after the Florida Supreme Court quashed our decision in Dobson v. Samson, 598 So.2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and remanded for reconsideration in light of Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). Dobson v. Samson, 623 So.2d 473 (Fla.1993). Because the trial court did not have the benefit of Mize when it made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with Mize.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dobson v. Samson, 627 So. 2d 1232, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1993 WL 495414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1232 (Dobson v. Samson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mize v. Mize
621 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Dobson v. Samson
598 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dobson v. Samson
623 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)