Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co.

72 N.Y.S. 1100

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying motion for a new trial, and the judgment, should be affirmed, except that part of the judgment which awards costs to the defendant, and as to that part .it should be reversed, with costs to the respondent. The order denying the plaintiffs’ application for a certificate should be reversed, as we are of opinion that in this action a claim of title to real property arises on the pleadings, and an application for a certificate in such eases is unnecessary. The plaintiffs should make application to the clerk for taxation of their costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying motion for a new trial, and the judgment, should be affirmed, except that part of the judgment which awards costs to the defendant, and as to that part .it should be reversed, with costs to the respondent. The order denying the plaintiffs’ application for a certificate should be reversed, as we are of opinion that in this action a claim of title to real property arises on the pleadings, and an application for a certificate in such eases is unnecessary. The plaintiffs should make application to the clerk for taxation of their costs.

Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co., 72 N.Y.S. 1100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

72 N.Y.S. 1100 (Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.