Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co.

72 N.Y.S. 1100

This text of 72 N.Y.S. 1100 (Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dobson v. Dr. B. J. Kay Medical Co., 72 N.Y.S. 1100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying motion for a new trial, and the judgment, should be affirmed, except that part of the judgment which awards costs to the defendant, and as to that part .it should be reversed, with costs to the respondent. The order denying the plaintiffs’ application for a certificate should be reversed, as we are of opinion that in this action a claim of title to real property arises on the pleadings, and an application for a certificate in such eases is unnecessary. The plaintiffs should make application to the clerk for taxation of their costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 N.Y.S. 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobson-v-dr-b-j-kay-medical-co-nyappdiv-1901.