Dobson v. Dickson

8 Ala. 252
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

We cannot perceive, from any thing in the record, that the amendment was not fully authorized. It is evident from the record, that the clerk, in entering up the judgment, had connected this with another case, and thus produced the confusion that ensued. The parties appeared when the amendment was made, and if there was no sufficient evidence by which to amend the record, it should haye been shown by bill of exceptions.

The judgment was properly entered against all the parties to the original judgment, before the justice of the peace, although one of them did not unite in the bond for the certiorari.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dobson v. Dickson, 8 Ala. 252 (Ala. 1845).

8 Ala. 252 (Dobson v. Dickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. First Bank
72 So. 171 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Burdeshaw & Co. v. Comer & Co.
108 Ala. 617 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Brown v. Barnes
93 Ala. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Dumas v. Hunter
30 Ala. 188 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)