Dobransky v. EQT Production and Halliburton, Pets
This text of Dobransky v. EQT Production and Halliburton, Pets (Dobransky v. EQT Production and Halliburton, Pets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ERIC DOBRANSKY, : No. 120 WAL 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY AND : HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED. The Application to File Under Seal and Application for Leave to File a Reply
are DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dobransky v. EQT Production and Halliburton, Pets, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobransky-v-eqt-production-and-halliburton-pets-pa-2022.