Dobo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington

576 S.E.2d 324, 356 N.C. 656, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 34
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 2003·No. 256A02·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, New Hanover County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dobo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington, 576 S.E.2d 324, 356 N.C. 656, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 34 (N.C. 2003).

576 S.E.2d 324 (Dobo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham Green Flea Mkt. v. City of Durham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2024
Schooldev East
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
Innovative 55, LLC v. Robeson County
801 S.E.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Dellinger v. Lincoln County
789 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
Dellinger v. Lincoln Cty.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016
Swan Beach Corolla, L.L.C. v. County of Currituck
760 S.E.2d 302 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
695 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Independence News, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
568 F.3d 148 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
321 News & Video, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
619 S.E.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)