Dobler v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dobler v. Kaplan

18 A.D.2d 828, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 828 (Dobler v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dobler v. Kaplan, 18 A.D.2d 828, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of ¡the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit and enjoin the State Civil Service Commission from prosecuting any proceedings before it (pursuant to section 25 of the Civil Service Law) for the purpose of rescinding the appointment of the 25 petitioners to their respective positions in the Police Departments of Suffolk County and Town of Riverhead, and revoking their eligibility for such appointment, the commission appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk' County, dated October 11, 1961, which granted the application (see 27 Mise 2d 15). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application. [29 Mise 2d 294.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of ¡the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit and enjoin the State Civil Service Commission from prosecuting any proceedings before it (pursuant to section 25 of the Civil Service Law) for the purpose of rescinding the appointment of the 25 petitioners to their respective positions in the Police Departments of Suffolk County and Town of Riverhead, and revoking their eligibility for such appointment, the commission appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk' County, dated October 11, 1961, which granted the application (see 27 Mise 2d 15). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application. [29 Mise 2d 294.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 828, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobler-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack