Dobby v. Steck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dobby v. Steck

874 S.W.2d 514, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 414, 1994 WL 75785

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 1994·No. No. 64185·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Matthew Steck d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., appeals from an adverse judgment entered in the Associate Circuit Court of St. Louis County awarding respondent, Kathy Dobby, $5,992.11 plus costs on her breach of contract action. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Matthew Steck d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., appeals from an adverse judgment entered in the Associate Circuit Court of St. Louis County awarding respondent, Kathy Dobby, $5,992.11 plus costs on her breach of contract action. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Dobby v. Steck, 874 S.W.2d 514, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 414, 1994 WL 75785 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

874 S.W.2d 514 (Dobby v. Steck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.