Dobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dobbs v. State

1923 OK CR 455, 211 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 455, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 29, 1923

DocketNo. A-4039.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 455 (Dobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dobbs v. State, 1923 OK CR 455, 211 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 455, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. H. Dobbs, was convicted on an information charging that he did sell one-half gallon of whisky to one Ira Hamilton, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced1 to be confined for 90 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $250. From the judgment rendered on the 15th day of June, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on August 4, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed, and the case, which was submitted on the record, shows that the evidence for the state supports the allegations of the information, and that no evidence was offered on the part of the defense. An examination of the record discloses no merit in this appeal, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. H. Dobbs, was convicted on an information charging that he did sell one-half gallon of whisky to one Ira Hamilton, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced1 to be confined for 90 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $250. From the judgment rendered on the 15th day of June, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on August 4, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed, and the case, which was submitted on the record, shows that the evidence for the state supports the allegations of the information, and that no evidence was offered on the part of the defense. An examination of the record discloses no merit in this appeal, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 455, 211 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 455, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobbs-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.