Dobbs v. State

454 So. 2d 73, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14683
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1984·No. No. 83-1537·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COBB, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced on three counts of lewd and lascivious assault. We find the trial court’s justification for retention of jurisdiction was stated with individual particularity as required by section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1983).

The defendant is correct, however, in his contention that those portions of the sentencing orders retaining jurisdiction of the first one-third of each consecutive sentence are invalid. Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983) provides that where consecutive sentences are concerned, the court’s retention is limited to one-third of the total of the consecutive sentences imposed, rather than one-third of each consecutive sentence. See Adams v. State, 435 So.2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR RESEN-TENCING.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dobbs v. State, 454 So. 2d 73, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

454 So. 2d 73 (Dobbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
495 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)