Dobbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dobbs v. State

454 So. 2d 73, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14683

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1537

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 454 So. 2d 73 (Dobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dobbs v. State, 454 So. 2d 73, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1793, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced on three counts of lewd and lascivious assault. We find the trial court’s justification for retention of jurisdiction was stated with individual particularity as required by section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1983).

The defendant is correct, however, in his contention that those portions of the sentencing orders retaining jurisdiction of the first one-third of each consecutive sentence are invalid. Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983) provides that where consecutive sentences are concerned, the court’s retention is limited to one-third of the total of the consecutive sentences imposed, rather than one-third of each consecutive sentence. See Adams v. State, 435 So.2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR RESEN-TENCING.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI