Dobbs v. Green
2 Wis. 228
Opinion
By the Court,
The declaration in this case is clearly bad, and the demurrer by the plaintiff below, to the plea of the defendant below, reached [232] kack to the declaration. There is a misjoinder of counts ; one alleging a promise by the intestate, and another alleging a promise by the administratrix, rpjjgge wou}cj require different judgments, therefore cannot be joined. Moody vs. Ewen's Executors, 8 B. Monroe.
Nor is the judgment in conformity with the statute:
The judgment of the' court below is reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dobbs v. Green, 2 Wis. 228 (Wis. 1853).
2 Wis. 228 (Dobbs v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Shell Lake Lumber Co.
31 N.W. 694 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
Hall v. Hinckley
32 Wis. 362 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1873)
Dobbs v. Enearl
4 Wis. 451 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1856)