Dobbs v. Doblitz

425 So. 2d 1207, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21559
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1983·No. No. 81-1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The. trial court granted summary judgment in a will contest which involved allegations of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity. Without detailing all of the conflicting evidence, it suffices to say that the summary judgment was improper. “It is axiomatic that summary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial and that if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, affidavits and other evidence in the file raise the slightest doubt upon any issue of material fact then a summary judgment may not be [1208]*1208entered.” Unijax, Inc. v. Factory Insurance Association, 328 So.2d 448, 449 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1976).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dobbs v. Doblitz, 425 So. 2d 1207, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21559 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

425 So. 2d 1207 (Dobbs v. Doblitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monroe County v. New Port Largo, Inc.
441 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)