Dobbins v. National Union Insurance
This text of 48 A.D.2d 828 (Dobbins v. National Union Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon an appeal by permission, order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts affirmed, with costs (Hutzler v Hertz Corp., 47 AD2d 839). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan and Christ, JJ., concur; Munder, J., concurs in the result, upon the constraint of Hutzler v Hertz Corp. (47 AD2d 839), but adheres to the views expressed in the dissenting memorandum in that case. [70 Misc 2d 1087.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.2d 828, 372 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobbins-v-national-union-insurance-nyappdiv-1975.