Doane v. Hescock

155 N.Y.S. 210
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 14, 1915·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PAGE, J.

[1,2] It clearly appears that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of process, nor are the allegations sufficient to support an action for malicious prosecution of a civil action in this state. There is no allegation that the action resulted in damages to the business or reputation of the defendant or that in any way his personal or property rights were interfered with. The sole allegation as to damage is the trouble, inconvenience, and expense of defending the action. This is not sufficient. Paul v. Fargo, 84 App. Div. 9, 11, 13 (dissenting opinion, 21), 82 N. Y. Supp. 369; Fulton v. Ingalls, 165 App. Div. 323, 326, 151 N. Y. Supp. 130.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

SPIEARN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doane v. Hescock, 155 N.Y.S. 210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

155 N.Y.S. 210 (Doane v. Hescock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorak v. County of Nassau
329 F. Supp. 497 (E.D. New York, 1970)
Ring v. Ring
228 A.2d 582 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1967)
Miller v. Stern
262 A.D. 5 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Lobel v. Trade Bank
132 Misc. 643 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1928)