Doane v. Dunlap
1 Tapp. Rep. 145
This text of 1 Tapp. Rep. 145 (Doane v. Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doane v. Dunlap, 1 Tapp. Rep. 145 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1817).
Opinion
The objection to this declaration is, that it does not aver that the note was delivered to the payee. The cases cited shew that such averment is unnecessary. In cases of this kind, the plaintiff is never put to prove how he came into possession of the note: why then should he be held to aver it ? Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Tapp. Rep. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doane-v-dunlap-ohctcompljeffer-1817.