Doane v. Dunlap

1 Tapp. Rep. 145
Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas·Decided April 15, 1817·Published

Opinion

President.

The objection to this declaration is, that it does not aver that the note was delivered to the payee. The cases cited shew that such averment is unnecessary. In cases of this kind, the plaintiff is never put to prove how he came into possession of the note: why then should he be held to aver it ? Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doane v. Dunlap, 1 Tapp. Rep. 145 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1817).

1 Tapp. Rep. 145 (Doane v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.