Doane v. Clarke

668 F. App'x 26
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 2016
DocketNo. 15-8040
StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 26 (Doane v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doane v. Clarke, 668 F. App'x 26 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

DeAnthony Doane appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doane v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00539-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2015). The motions to submit an affidavit in response to the district court’s judgment, for an order compelling discovery, and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doane-v-clarke-ca4-2016.