Doane Steam Pump Co. v. Toch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Doane Steam Pump Co. v. Toch

92 N.Y.S. 35

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 35 (Doane Steam Pump Co. v. Toch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doane Steam Pump Co. v. Toch, 92 N.Y.S. 35 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

The trial judge in this case certifies that he is unable to-return the minutes of that portion of the trial that took place upon June 6 and 7, 1904. To supplement the return herein, and in accordance with section 319 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1581, c. 580), the respective parties to this action have handed up affidavits purporting to contain the testimony of the witnesses "who were sworn upon the two days above mentioned. These affidavits are conflicting not only upon the question at issue, but it is also set forth in the opposing affidavits that (in several important respects) the defendant’s witnesses did not testify upon the trial as they now testify in their affidavits aforesaid. It is also claimed by the plaintiff and set forth in his opposing affidavits that certain exhibits now handed up, and purporting to have been marked as having been received in evidence, were not so received [36]*36or marked upon the trial. It is substantially conceded that the stenographer’s minutes taken upon the two days of the trial above mentioned cannot be obtained owing to the inability to discover the whereabouts of the stenographer who took them. In their absence, and in view of the conflicting nature of the affidavits submitted, this case should be sent back for a new trial.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, J.

The trial judge in this case certifies that he is unable to-return the minutes of that portion of the trial that took place upon June 6 and 7, 1904. To supplement the return herein, and in accordance with section 319 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1581, c. 580), the respective parties to this action have handed up affidavits purporting to contain the testimony of the witnesses "who were sworn upon the two days above mentioned. These affidavits are conflicting not only upon the question at issue, but it is also set forth in the opposing affidavits that (in several important respects) the defendant’s witnesses did not testify upon the trial as they now testify in their affidavits aforesaid. It is also claimed by the plaintiff and set forth in his opposing affidavits that certain exhibits now handed up, and purporting to have been marked as having been received in evidence, were not so received [36]*36or marked upon the trial. It is substantially conceded that the stenographer’s minutes taken upon the two days of the trial above mentioned cannot be obtained owing to the inability to discover the whereabouts of the stenographer who took them. In their absence, and in view of the conflicting nature of the affidavits submitted, this case should be sent back for a new trial.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doane-steam-pump-co-v-toch-nyappterm-1905.