D.O. v. T.B.
722 A.2d 114, 317 N.J. Super. 323, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 523
Opinion
We affirm Judge Conforti’s decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiffs claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 429, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91, 106 (1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.O. v. T.B., 722 A.2d 114, 317 N.J. Super. 323, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 523 (N.J. Ct. App. 1998).
722 A.2d 114 (D.O. v. T.B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D.W. v. R.W.
52 A.3d 1043 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Fazilat v. Feldstein
848 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
F.F. v. N.F.
848 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)