D.O. v. T.B.

722 A.2d 114, 317 N.J. Super. 323, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 523
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 29, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 722 A.2d 114 (D.O. v. T.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.O. v. T.B., 722 A.2d 114, 317 N.J. Super. 323, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 523 (N.J. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Judge Conforti’s decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiffs claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 429, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91, 106 (1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.W. v. R.W.
52 A.3d 1043 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Fazilat v. Feldstein
848 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
F.F. v. N.F.
848 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 A.2d 114, 317 N.J. Super. 323, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/do-v-tb-njsuperctappdiv-1998.