D.O. v. State
77 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 2011·No. No. 3D10-3001·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
Affirmed. See E.P. v. State, 997 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Jackson v. State, 791 P.2d 1023 (Alaska Ct.App. 1990)(“in the case of transportation in a [788] police vehicle, however, or in the analogous circumstances here, the necessity of close proximity will itself provide the needed basis for a protective pat-down of the person”), In re Kelsey, 243 Wis.2d 422, 626 N.W.2d 777 (2001), and State v. Evans, 67 Ohio St.3d 405, 618 N.E.2d 162 (1993)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.O. v. State, 77 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
77 So. 3d 787 (D.O. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
A.J.R. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
D.J.D., a child v. State
143 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
State ex rel. J.H.
137 So. 3d 748 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)
L.C. v. State
105 So. 3d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)