Do v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Do v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles

138 A.3d 931, 322 Conn. 901, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 204

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 21, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 164 Conn.App. 616, 138 A.3d 359 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that 'principles of fundamental fairness' dictated that, despite complying with General Statutes § 14-227b (c), the Department of Motor Vehicles hearing officer should have excluded the police report of the plaintiff's arrest as unreliable."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 164 Conn.App. 616, 138 A.3d 359 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that 'principles of fundamental fairness' dictated that, despite complying with General Statutes § 14-227b (c), the Department of Motor Vehicles hearing officer should have excluded the police report of the plaintiff's arrest as unreliable."

Do v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles, 138 A.3d 931, 322 Conn. 901, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 204 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

138 A.3d 931 (Do v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related