DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON vs STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 2023
Docket21-1894
StatusPublished

This text of DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON vs STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON vs STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON vs STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-1894 LT Case No. 2020-SC-004385

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2023

Nonfinal Appeal from the County Court for Seminole County, James J. DeKleva, Judge.

Chad A. Barr, of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Kurt T. Koehler, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order transferring venue under section 47.122, Florida

Statutes (2021), is affirmed. Based upon the transcript that Appellee

submitted below of the deposition of its insured, who is a material witness,

the court did not abuse its discretion in granting Appellee’s motion to transfer

venue. See Cohen v. Scarnato, 270 So. 3d 410, 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

(applying the abuse of discretion standard of review to a trial court’s order

transferring venue under section 47.122).

We do, however, remand this case to the trial court with directions that

the court amend its order to assess accrued costs against Appellee. See §

47.191, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“No change of venue shall be granted except on

condition that the movant, unless otherwise provided by the order of transfer,

shall pay all costs that have accrued in the action including the required

transfer fee.”). The amended order shall set forth a reasonable period of

time for Appellee to pay these costs.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O SELENE WASHINGTON vs STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dns-auto-glass-shop-llc-aao-selene-washington-vs-state-farm-mutual-fladistctapp-2023.