Dn Szarka v. Solargen Electronics, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dn Szarka v. Solargen Electronics, Ltd.

87 A.D.2d 628, 450 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 628 (Dn Szarka v. Solargen Electronics, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dn Szarka v. Solargen Electronics, Ltd., 87 A.D.2d 628, 450 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated April 14,1981, which denied their cross motion, inter alia, for partial summary judgment as to the liability on all 24 causes of action, and to dismiss defendants’ affirmative defenses. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision granting the cross motion to the extent of dismissing the fourth affirmative defenses asserted by the defendants. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The complaint states viable causes of action. Weinstein, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated April 14,1981, which denied their cross motion, inter alia, for partial summary judgment as to the liability on all 24 causes of action, and to dismiss defendants’ affirmative defenses. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision granting the cross motion to the extent of dismissing the fourth affirmative defenses asserted by the defendants. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The complaint states viable causes of action. Weinstein, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 628, 450 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dn-szarka-v-solargen-electronics-ltd-nyappdiv-1982.