D.N. and V.R.N. v. A.E.E. and A.M.E.
This text of D.N. and V.R.N. v. A.E.E. and A.M.E. (D.N. and V.R.N. v. A.E.E. and A.M.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 24, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D26-0599 Lower Tribunal No. 24-16088-FC-04 ________________
D.N. and V.R.N., Petitioners,
vs.
A.E.E. and A.M.E., Respondents.
A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge.
Susan Meisel Levin, P.A., and Susan Meisel Levin, for petitioners.
Tate Healey Webster, and Erica T. Healey (Tampa), for respondents.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY, and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order under
review. See Interest of K.P.L., 334 So. 3d 356, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022)
(where a motion to vacate or set aside an adoption presents a colorable
entitlement to relief, the motion cannot be dismissed without an evidentiary
hearing).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
D.N. and V.R.N. v. A.E.E. and A.M.E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dn-and-vrn-v-aee-and-ame-fladistctapp-2026.