Home/U.S. Customs Court/Dmitrovsky v. United States

Dmitrovsky v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 347, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 747
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 1954
DocketNo. 58348; protests 829717-G and 743799-G (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 347 (Dmitrovsky v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dmitrovsky v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 347, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 747 (cusc 1954).

Opinions

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “M” consists of moufflons the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Abstract 57768 and that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same as those involved in Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Cust. Ct. 347, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dmitrovsky-v-united-states-cusc-1954.