Dmitrovsky Bros. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 389
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1956·No. No. 59806; protests 941943-G, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinions
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Rung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dmitrovsky Bros. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 389 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 389 (Dmitrovsky Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)