Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 347
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
DocketNo. 60997; protests 974974-G, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 347 (Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 347 (cusc 1957).

Opinions

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dmitrovsky-bros-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.