D.M.H. v. State

717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 11, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2815
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 717 So. 2d 149 (D.M.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.M.H. v. State, 717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge.

Appellant appeals from an adjudication of delinquency after he was found guilty of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and possession of a firearm by a minor. We affirm.

Whether or not the semi-automatic handgun which the officer testified appellant pointed at him, and which was found fully loaded, was a deadly weapon was a question for the jury, Dale v. State, 703 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1997), despite the lack of testimony that the gun was operable. We find no merit in appellant’s remaining point on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suit v. State
901 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ford v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COM'N
717 So. 2d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dmh-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.