D.M.H. v. State
This text of 717 So. 2d 149 (D.M.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an adjudication of delinquency after he was found guilty of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and possession of a firearm by a minor. We affirm.
Whether or not the semi-automatic handgun which the officer testified appellant pointed at him, and which was found fully loaded, was a deadly weapon was a question for the jury, Dale v. State, 703 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1997), despite the lack of testimony that the gun was operable. We find no merit in appellant’s remaining point on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dmh-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.