D.M.H. v. State
717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1998·No. No. 97-2815·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an adjudication of delinquency after he was found guilty of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and possession of a firearm by a minor. We affirm.
Whether or not the semi-automatic handgun which the officer testified appellant pointed at him, and which was found fully loaded, was a deadly weapon was a question for the jury, Dale v. State, 703 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1997), despite the lack of testimony that the gun was operable. We find no merit in appellant’s remaining point on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.M.H. v. State, 717 So. 2d 149, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11557, 1998 WL 611619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 149 (D.M.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Suit v. State
901 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ford v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COM'N
717 So. 2d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)